Dan Proskauer: Vision and Leadership for Newton Schools!
 

Prior to initiating a search for our next Superintendent, we must have a clear vision for NPS.  We must back this vision with examples of how it will be measured.  We must ensure that we limit the vision to the “vital few” and that they be specific, logical, measurable and focused.

This is a difficult task and one which the entire community should involve itself in.  To start the conversation and to put my money where my mouth is, here is my proposal.

Vision/Goal #1NPS returns to the top ten nationally recognized public school systems

Outcome Measurements:
 o Graduation rates, college matriculations
 o Advanced Placement test participation, scores
 o MCAS, other standardized test results
 o STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) career metrics
 o Extra curricular participation (both breadth and depth), including success in competitive events
 o Effective School Councils in place at every school
 o School Improvement Plans in place and tracked regularly at every school
 o Parent satisfaction surveys
 o Student satisfaction surveys
 o Teacher satisfaction surveys
 o Administration satisfaction surveys
 o National rankings (lagging indicator)
 

Vision/Goal #2NPS operates in a fiscally sound/sustainable manner

Outcome Measurements:
 o Multiyear financial plan is in place and reviewed at least annually that supports ongoing operations within constraints of reliable funding assumptions
 o Multiyear facility plan is in place (accounted for in financial plan) and reviewed at least annually that supports restoration of all facilities to minimally acceptable standards and then maintains or improves from that basis
 

Vision/Goal #3NPS has a special education program that meets the needs of all students

Outcome Measurements:
 o IEPs are in place and agreed with all stakeholders promptly
 o Success against IEPs (in aggregate) is reported monthly with corrective action proposed for gaps
 o Focus and reporting on success in moving students closer to “graduating” from special education with emphasis on early and aggressive intervention
 o Non-confrontational and privacy protected process in place for all constituents (special and general education stakeholders) to express concerns
 
Vision/Goal #4 - NPS returns focus to Neighborhood Schools

Outcome Measurements:
 o Long range facilities plan is in place that supports Neighborhood School vision 

 o Enrollment at each elementary school is capped at 400 students (or medium-term plan is in place to reduce enrollment to cap) 
 o Median and mean distance from homes in each school district is actively reviewed and managed with a goal of reverting to 1978 levels over time
 o Percentage of students walking to school is tracked and schools are rewarded for reducing vehicular transportation (bus and car)

 o Parent participation in elementary school communities is tracked and schools are rewarded for higher participation rates


Vision/Goal #5NPS encourages and nurtures innovation

Outcome Measurements
 o Formal processes in place to identify innovations and opportunities for innovations
 o Formal processes to evaluate and fund innovation pilots
 o Regular assessment of pilots and publication of results (both positive and negative)
 o Regular review of progress of institutionalization of successful innovations
 o Annual “Innovation Report” describing the results of innovation for the year (including what was learned from unsuccessful innovations)


Potential Innovations:
 o Expanded Learning Time
 o “Charter” schools or classrooms
 o Differentiated instruction/tracking by learning style instead of ability level
 o Aggressive use of technology to leverage instructional staff resources
 o Digital classroom

 


Comments

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:31:25

I'd like to speak about SpEd, especially in the high schools. My kids, both with IEPs, have been in Newton schools since elementary, and as they have gotten older (junior and senior at South) their IEPs have been more ignored and more fiddled with. They DO NOT meet IDEA standards, they often to not address issues that the IEPs are based upon, and I have found the SpEd department at NSHS to be a sham. And yes, I do have degrees in SpEd and I do know what I'm talking about, even though they refuse to listen to anything I say. SpEd in Newton is in a HUGE mess, the high school programs are horrible except for Southside, which is a GodSend, and I see them as nothing but a dumping ground for Metco and SpEd kids where they are stuck in Curr 2 classes led by teachers who can't control the classes and NO learning is going on.

 

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:32:53

Margalit, what you say echoes what I have heard from others. That's why I think we need to be tracking some basic questions.

What percentage of IEPs are valid and working? I don’t know. Is it improving? Degrading? I don’t know. While I don’t have a child directly involved in special education, I still care about whether our programs are working or not. I have heard, very anecdotally, that there is reluctance to pass bad news up the chain on this front (on the school side). I have also heard, again anecdotally, that recent cuts in spending have been penny wise and pound foolish in terms of reducing early intervention that could reduce or eliminate more costly accommodation later.

 

Comments will be queued for approval before being posted.


Leave a Reply